The ALS Association Refuses to Help - Mindbending …
I recently got involved in a very important initiative aimed at attempting to accelerate the authorization and availability of Compassionate Use Drugs for ALS patients and sent this note to over 500 people:
=====================================
Please take a moment and Go to Change.org — http://www.change.org/petitions/corporate-citizens-authorize-and-make-available-compassionate-use-drugs-for-als-patients-now — to support this critical initiative and sign this petition …
Why This Is Important
As a community of people with ALS, and their caretakers, we are advocating for the acceleration of ALS treatments that will slow progression.
ALS, sometimes referred to as Lou Gehrig’s Disease, is a progressive, fatal, neurodegenerative disease with most people dying within two to five years of diagnosis.
Terminally ill patients with little to lose want access to what is available that has shown safety and efficacy as soon as possible. We believe that Phase 2 drugs showing safety and efficacy, such as Dexpramipexole, and NP001, as well as off label wf10, should be made available to us through Compassionate Use Now.
Join us in calling for COMPASSIONATE USE DRUGS FOR ALS PATIENTS NOW!
Thanks so much!
V/r,
Tom
Tom Murphy
703.395.3615
Tmurphy58@gmail.com
========================================
I sent this note to the folks at the ALS Association on the same day:
Is there any chance that the ALSA would support this initiative and possibly use your master mail list that has all the folks who made contributions to the ALSA Walks across the country in 2011?
It would sure help us to get to the 10,000 signature level that we want.
Your support would be greatly appreciated by all of us 3,400+ that have already signed the petition.
V/r,
Tom Murphy
======================================================
I’d like to share with you the disappointing response I received some 4 days later from the ALS Association and my subsequent response below:
=====================================
Dear Tom,
I’m afraid our Chapter isn’t going to be able to forward the petition calling for compassionate use drugs for ALS patients to our constituents, as you requested in your email earlier this week. I can only imagine how strongly you feel about this issue and am both sorry and sad to have to disappoint you. However, just today, The ALS Association released the following statement, which explains our position on the issue.
Ted Harada and folks from the national Association are going to be speaking about this issue next Wednesday, so you may want to follow up with Ted next Thursday or Friday.
Statement on Compassionate Use for Dexpramipexole
In our quest to create a world without ALS, The ALS Association believes that people with ALS should have access to effective treatments as quickly as possible. Our first core value is that people with ALS and their families come first in everything we do. When it comes to advancing therapies for ALS, we work with all stakeholders in an effort to find the best path forward.
We realize that time is the most precious commodity for people living with ALS. For this reason, we are working closely with Biogen Idec and other companies developing potential treatments for ALS. Our goal is to facilitate clinical trials and accelerate the availability of treatments, including access to compassionate use programs. As a result of the effort, we are pleased to report that Biogen has indicated that they will provide compassionate use access to dexpramipexole as soon as data becomes available showing that the compound is effective and safe in the larger Phase III study.
The ALS Association is committed to helping make promising treatments available as quickly as possible. We will continue to communicate with Biogen and other organizations about the needs and concerns of people with ALS and their families. In the meantime, it is absolutely critical that people with ALS continue to participate in clinical trials. Ultimately, patient enrollment and participation in clinical trials is the only way to determine the effectiveness of treatments for this devastating disease.
Respectfully,
Ronnie Gunnerson
Executive Director
ALS Association – DC/MD/VA Chapter
7507 Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855
(301) 978-9855 | 1-866-348-3257 Ext. 204
Fax: (301) 978-9854
RGunnerson@alsinfo.org
www.ALSinfo.org
=======================================================
My immediate response to this very disappointing “statement” from the ALS Association was as follows:
“Very disappointing to say the least … it seems to me lately that the ALSA folks aren’t really hearing the many voices of the folks you serve …
This statement/position doesn’t make much sense to me and doesn’t really seem to explain WHY the ALSA doesn’t support this specific movement for Compassionate Use Drugs for ALS Patients.
I’ll make sure to let everyone in my network know the ALSA position on this.”
I feel that most of us who are already on trials aren’t looking to drop out of these trials (most of us know that we will eventually be put on the real thing if the trial results are positive) – we understand the risks and the benefits to the rest of the ALS patient population – the targeted population of this initiative are those thousands who were not selected or couldn’t qualify for the studies or were recently diagnosed – this is such a fast moving disease in some cases that while folks wait for the next trial or the start of a Phase 3, a year or more in time may pass and by that time they may have progressed to the point where they won’t qualify to participate.
The theme of this initiative is as follows:
Terminally ill patients with little to lose want access to what is available that has shown safety and efficacy as soon as possible. We believe that Phase 2 drugs showing safety and efficacy, such as Dexpramipexole and NP001, as well as off label wf10, should be made available to us through Compassionate Use Now.
Seems to me like the entire human population of the planet Earth would be very supportive of this type of thing for terminally ill patients with ALS.
What would be wrong with finding a way to address the thousands of folks who were not selected for the trials due to study limits or couldn’t qualify for the studies just because they were diagnosed more than two years ago or those that were recently diagnosed with ALS and have to wait for the end of an 18-month Phase 3 study? What is the worst thing that could happen?
That’s my point of view and I would have thought that the ALSA would have had a somewhat similar thought process about this.
V/r,
Tom Murphy